Friday, 24 July 2026

Haunted Histories: Trinity and the Search for Life after Death, 1850-1950


Trinity College, Cambridge, has long been associated with psychical research (as indeed has Cambridge University more widely). In a paper based on a talk given at the Second International Society for Psychical Research Conference, held at Trinity College in March 1978, Alan Gauld began by stating that “There was a time – just about within living memory – when Cambridge, and particularly Trinity, was the undoubted centre of the parapsychological world.” Four years later the SPR was back at Trinity for its Centenary Jubilee Conference, held in conjunction with the Parapsychological Association, reinforcing the relationship between the Society for Psychical Research (SPR) and Cambridge.

Significant members of the SPR associated with Trinity who will be well known to psychical researchers, and some more widely, include Henry Sidgwick, F W H Myers, Edmund Gurney, Richard Hodgson, Arthur Balfour, John Strutt, 3rd Baron Rayleigh, Walter Leaf, Arthur Woollgar Verrall, Gerald Balfour, Everard Feilding, J J Thomson, W H Salter, Robert Strutt, 4th Baron Rayleigh, C D Broad, A R G Owen, Peter Fenwick, Brian Josephson and Bernard Carr. Of these, Sidgwick, Myers and Gurney are particularly notable as the driving force of the SPR in its early days.

As an indication of the influence of this group, of these members the following served terms as president of the SPR:  Henry Sidgwick 1882-1884 and 1888-1892; Frederic Myers 1900; Arthur Balfour 1893; 3rd Baron Rayleigh 1919 (plus the Nobel prize for Physics in 1904); Gerald Balfour 1906-07; W H Salter 1947-48; 4th Baron Rayleigh 1937-38; C D Broad 1935-36 and 1958-60; and Bernard Carr 2000-2004. J J Thomson never served as president, but as a consolation he was awarded the Nobel prize for Physics in 1906.

Now there is a small exhibition at the Wren Library, Trinity College, from 24 June to 18 September, Haunted Histories: Trinity and the Search for Life after Death, 1850-1950. Entry is free, Monday-Friday, 12.00-2.00 pm. It has been put together by Zoe Zimmer as a trainee librarianship project, and although occupying only four cases it is worth a visit if one is in the area. The contents draw on Trinity’s library and archive (the main SPR paper archive is held at Cambridge University Library) to highlight its holdings on Spiritualism and psychical research. Some of the publications have been selected as much for their attractiveness as for their historical value (and are guaranteed to make the bibliophile salivate), but those on display represent a tiny fraction of the college’s collection.

The first case looks at nineteenth-century Spiritualism. As well as contextual information on the rise of modern Spiritualism after 1848, and noting the facilitation of its dissemination by the spread of print media, there are copies of a number of representative books from the period: Benjamin Coleman’s Spiritualism in America (1861), Samuel Guppy’s Mary Jane; or, Spiritualism Chemically Explained (1863), J H Powell’s Spiritualism: Its Facts and Phases (1864), Edward Cox’s Spiritualism Answered by Science (1872), Allan Kardec’s Experimental Spiritism: The Medium’s Book (1876), and N B Wolfe’s Startling Facts in Modern Spiritualism (1883).

Case two contains more manuscript material than books. It covers SPR founders Sidgwick, Myers and Gurney, all fellows of Trinity, charting their developing interest in examining Spiritualism prior to the establishment of the SPR in 1882. They were towering figures in the history of the Society, whose like we will probably not see again, though I doubt they would have appreciated the caption title ‘supernatural scholars’. Nor would they have been pleased to see a copy of Trevor Hall’s hatchet job The Strange Case of Edmund Gurney (1964), open at Gurney’s portrait. A folding double frame contains two portraits of Myers at different stages of life, the wild young romantic clutching his head contrasting with the staid serious middle-aged thinker staring into the distance. A photograph of Sidgwick with his large unkempt beard completes the triumvirate.

An 1867 letter from Sidgwick to his mother discusses the importance of the study of Spiritualism, and another of his to her from 1874 describes staying with Lord Rayleigh (i.e. the third Baron) to meet one of the Fox sisters, who were such important, if controversial, figures in the development of Spiritualism. An 1874 letter from Sidgwick to Myers discusses Gurney’s willingness to participate in an investigation of Spiritualism, and an 1875 letter from the Master of Trinity, W H Thompson, to Sidgwick, on mourning stationery, says he will not obstruct Sidgwick’s investigations. The case is completed by a copy of J J Thomson’s 1936 autobiography Recollections and Reflections, open at the chapter devoted to psychical research. Thomson had been persuaded by Myers to attend séances in the 1890s, but had found the results disappointing – either nothing happened, or there was a strong suspicion of fraud.

The third case mostly focuses on the SPR, though it fits in a pair of spirit photographs, taken at a séances attended by Myers, showing crudely executed extras. A handwritten account of a séances Myers attended, probably in 1875, is written up in Sidgwick’s hand. Often popular histories of the SPR focus on the Cambridge connection and omit those outside that circle who also made a contribution to the SPR’s formation, in order to downplay the Spiritualist element present in the Society’s first years. Chief among these were Edmund Dawson Rogers and William Barrett. Here, Rogers is not name-checked but Barrett is, with a form letter sent by Barrett in December 1881 to Trinity alumnus Lord Houghton proposing to hold a meeting to discuss the feasibility of an organisation devoted to the subject; Lord Houghton became a member, one of a number of eminent individuals.

A caption describes the foundation, though it states that Sidgwick held the presidency for 18 years. He died 18 years after the SPR was constituted in February 1882, in 1900. The first volumes of the SPR’s Proceedings and Journal (the latter distributed to members only) are shown, and finally the first volume of the book that immortalised the names of Gurney, Myers and Frank Podmore: Phantasms of the Living (1886). Gurney died two years later, robbing psychical research of one of its most significant contributors. A QR code links to the Cambridge University Library catalogue, mentioning that the library holds the bulk of the SPR archive (still owned by the SPR).

The final case brings the story up to the mid-twentieth century. It begins with the papers of William Henry Salter which he donated to Trinity, dealing with automatic writing, notably the cross-correspondences. These are interrelated messages received through mediums working independently, frequently containing classical allusions. They appear to form a coherent whole only when combined, indicating the presence of a guiding personality communicating through the mediums. A 1963 letter from Salter to Broad says he is writing to the Master of Trinity asking if the college would take charge of his set of volumes of the printed scripts and papers (it did, fortunately). A 1901 automatic script produced by Margaret Verrall (the wife of a Trinity fellow and Salter’s mother-in-law) is shown, along with the portrait of Salter accompanying Broad’s obituary of him, published in a 1970 issue of the SPR’s Journal. An early volume dealing with the cross-correspondences, Herbert Saltmarsh’s Evidence of Personal Survival from Cross-Correspondences (1938) is displayed, along with one of Broad’s psychical research notebooks.

A label describes the Perrott-Warrick Fund, administered by Trinity, which supports psychical research from bequests made by Frank Perrott in 1937 and Frederic Warrick in 1956. It addresses the areas also covered by the SPR’s two funds: general psi and the continuation of consciousness after death. Additionally, both Broad and Warrick donated books to Trinity. Cumulatively, the bequests and donations made Trinity a significant presence in psychical research. The exgibition concludes with a long 1945 letter from Warrick to Broad, and two photographs: a group photograph taken during an invitation-only psychical research conference held at Newnham in 1955, relevant because of the presence of Broad, though presumably the college has images taken during the conferences held at Trinity (one from the 1982 centenary conference would have been nice), and a portrait of Broad standing in the Great Court at Trinity.

Folder from the 1982 conference. Author’s collection

If contemplating a visit, it is worth bearing in mind that the Wren Library is a tourist attraction, and numbers entering are limited – it is after all a working library – so there may be a wait to get in. However, for those not able to attend the exhibition, Zoe Zimmer is planning to digitise it for the library’s website. To anyone who has not been I can recommend the experience, both because it is a beautiful library, and reaching it involves a short walk along the Trinity side of the Cam running along the Backs.

 

Coincidentally, a couple of days after my visit I came across an online article by Lydia Wilson, ‘Parapsychology Is Coming in From the Cold’, with the optimistic subtitle, ‘The University of Cambridge is home to an archive and a fellowship for psychical research – an area gaining ground, even in the mainstream’. This refers to the SPR’s archive held at Cambridge University Library (CUL), and Wilson covers, in a positive manner, a variety of topics relating to the SPR and psychical research. However, I took issue with one statement: ‘There was already a substantial archive [in CUL], and it was gradually growing as the society [i.e. SPR] sorted through their own holdings.’

The phrase ‘their own holdings’ implies that the collection held at CUL no longer belongs to the SPR, whereas it has to be emphasised that the SPR still owns it. Authors occasionally make this mistake, and it seems that sometimes the University does little to disabuse them, so that it has been known for books using SPR material to include thanks to the Syndics of Cambridge University Library for permission to reproduce it, rather than the SPR. This does not apply to the Wren Library, which is the owner of its holdings in psychical research.

 

References

Gauld, Alan. (1978) 'Psychical Research in Cambridge from the Seventeenth Century to the Present', Journal of the Society for Psychical Research, 49(778), pp. 925–937.

Wilson, Lydia. (2026) 'Parapsychology is Coming in from the Cold', New Lines Magazine, 17 July. Available at: https://newlinesmag.com/essays/parapsychology-is-coming-in-from-the-cold/ (Accessed: 18 July 2026).

Sunday, 3 May 2026

A New Editor of the Society for Psychical Research’s Psi Encyclopedia

A New Editor of the Society for Psychical Research’s Psi Encyclopedia

I’ve reported a couple of times on the Society for Psychical Research’s online Psi Encyclopedia (PE), designed to be a more reliable guide than Wikipedia to subjects which fall within psychical research.  Under the able guidance of its first editor, Robert McLuhan, it grew in size until, as chair of the Education and Publicity Committee Bernard Carr stated in his contribution to the SPR’s 2024/25 annual Report, it contains almost two million words (and is still growing).

It was recently given a makeover as the original platform, inaugurated in 2014, was creaking with age.  The new version offers a more up-to-date look and enhanced accessibility of topics, both within the PE and to articles in the SPR’s Journal and Proceedings via a ‘links library’.  Unfortunately, the ability to download files as PDFs and epubs has disappeared, but I have been told that it requires a plug-in which will be reinstalled shortly.  I personally like to transfer articles to an e-reader, so will be pleased when that happens.

Bernard Carr added in his report that “The founding editor, Robert McLuhan, is moving on and the name of his successor will be announced shortly.”  A new editor has now been appointed, but the transfer was low-key and no announcement was made.  The current ‘About’ section of the PE states:

“The PE was created by Robert McLuhan, who edited it until April 2026, when he was succeeded by James G Matlock as General Editor and a team of Associate Editors (Nemo Mörck, KM Wehrstein, Melvyn Willin and Nancy L Zingrone). The site was developed by Ian Rons and Circle Interactive and is currently under the management of James Matlock and Hugh Matlock. Its initial funding came a bequest [sic] from Nigel Buckmaster, a long-time member of the SPR.”

Jim Matlock is a Research Fellow at the Parapsychology Foundation and is best known for his work on reincarnation.  He has gathered a useful group of associates, which acknowledges that the size and scope of the project are too great for one person to manage with only ad-hoc assistance.  Nemo Mörck is the SPR’s website content manager and Journal reviews editor; Karen Wehrstein has been a prolific contributor to the encyclopaedia, mostly in, but not confined to, the field of reincarnation (she wrote the PE entry on Matlock); Melvyn Willin is the SPR’s archives officer, custodian of the Society’s AV collection, and a frequent PE contributor; Nancy Zingrone is an eminent parapsychologist with a longstanding connection to the Parapsychology Foundation, and also with a PE page devoted to her (co-written by Matlock).

One obvious point is that, of the new team, only one member is based in the UK, while two are in the United States, one is in Canada and one is in Sweden.  The style guide for contributors states that the PE adheres to British English standards – with the minor exception of most hyphenated words – so one hopes Americanisms will not creep in (though the paragraph following this reassurance begins with the word “Organize”).  However, the expertise assembled bodes well for the future of the project as a dependable source of information, provided that no difficulties arise from perceived conflicts of interest, such as the one that occurred during the final weeks of McLuhan’s tenure.

This concerned the PE entry on Eileen Garrett, founder of the Parapsychology Foundation, which was written by Matlock.  There have been two recent books critical of some of the assertions Garrett made about herself (their very titles alluding to deception), but one of these, by Lis Warwood, was only listed in the bibliography and not referred to in the text, while the other, by Julie Coyle, was mentioned briefly in passing, with no elucidation of her claims.  Any rounded portrait of Garrett should have included discussion of these authors’ findings, though it is understandable there might be discomfort in the Parapsychology Foundation camp at having them aired.  After disquiet about potential bias was raised on Facebook the article was withdrawn, and a revised version is awaited with interest.  In the meantime, there is an article in the PE about the Parapsychology Foundation, co-written by Matlock.

 

Update 6 May 2026:

The new Psi Encyclopedia regime has now been announced to the world on social media, so it has not been quite as quiet a transfer as I had thought it would be, and to mark the changing of the guard the website has some additions.  Firstly, in recognition that the funds from the Buckmaster bequest used to support the project have now diminished substantially, a page soliciting donations has been introduced.  This is an excellent idea, and I hope some of those who benefit from its information will feel moved to give something, though as the regular Wikipedia appeals indicate, obtaining money from users is not always easy.

Another innovation is a bi-weekly ‘Editors’ Blog’, the first instalment of which was penned by Jim Matlock and dated 4 May, which I think gives a good idea of his vision for the PE.  For a start, he doesn’t seem to be in sympathy with the term psychical research, referring toacademic parapsychology, which until the 1930s was better known as psychical research.”  This suggests that psychical research as a term is redundant and has been completely superseded by parapsychology, whereas in practice the two co-exist, albeit uneasily.

Before stressing the continuity in aims for the Encyclopedia, he announces two more names on the editorial team.  In addition to the Associate Editors, there are two “staff writers”: Courtney Block and Roberto R Narváez.  This brings the total of personnel working on the editorial side of the PE to seven, definitely a multinational group, but with three in the US, one in Canada, one in Mexico, one in Sweden, and only one in the UK.  Hugh Matlock is a software developer, which will be useful in keeping the look of the PE up to date.

Matlock refers to the SPR as the “PE’s sponsor” rather than owner, suggesting an element of autonomy (whereas the PE falls within the remit of the SPR’s Education and Publicity Committee).  Furthermore, the new Facebook page and Bluesky feed headers refer to ‘Psi Encyclopedia’ rather than ‘The SPR’s Psi Encyclopedia’, downplaying the association.  These moves suggest a desire to create some distance between the Society and the PE, though when I raised the issue of the abbreviated title, Matlock pointed out that there were multiple references to the SPR within the PE, so the link was firmly visible to readers.

An alternative view is that no opportunity should be lost to emphasise the relationship.  I have looked after the Psi Encyclopedia Twitter/X account since 2019 (shortly to be handed over to the editorial team) and was careful there, and in my other SPR social media activities, to ensure it was always referred to as the SPR’s Psi Encyclopedia.  The connection may be shown within the PE, but when people are discussing its articles, that connection can become severed, so stressing the SPR at every opportunity is important.  However, it is early days and the new team is still bedding in, so there may be refinements as it gains experience and obtains feedback on its efforts.  The reservations above aside, there is a vigorous programme of new entries, and that is to be welcomed.

 

References

Carr, Bernard (2026) ‘Report of the Education and Publicity Committee’, Society for Psychical Research Annual Report 2024/25. Available at: https://www.spr.ac.uk/node/19834 (Accessed: 1 May 2026).

Coyle, Julie (2024) The Early Life of Irish Psychic and Trance Medium Eileen J. Garrett: Fact or Fabrication? Independently published.

Matlock, James G. (2026) ‘New Team, Old Direction’, Psi Encyclopedia.  Available at: https://psi-encyclopedia.spr.ac.uk/2026/05/04/new-team-old-direction/ (Accessed 5 May 2026).

Psi Encyclopedia (no date) ‘About’. Available at: https://psi-encyclopedia.spr.ac.uk/about/ (Accessed: 1 May 2026).

Warwood, Elizabeth J. C. (2025) Behind the Medium's Mask: Eileen Garrett's Shadow Self. New Directions Network.